LMRuntime.com / Public page

Governance

How Teleodynamic-informed controls wrap the deterministic runtime path without changing parity behavior.

Teleodynamic-informed governance is a separate control layer around tools, memory, claims, and structural changes. It does not alter deterministic model math, claim consciousness, certify safety, or govern human thought.

Operational principles

Bounded actionTokens, tools, memory, retrieval, review time, and uncertainty remain inside explicit budgets.
No-op dominanceWhen evidence, authority, budget, or review state is insufficient, the preferred result is no-op plus a structured reason.
Review before promotionStructural changes, public claims, evidence promotion, and release decisions use a slower human-review loop.
Evidence before claimsPublic language follows recorded execution instead of anticipated capability.

Two lanes, one explicit boundary

  • Deterministic lane: GGUF parsing, tokenizer behavior, tensor binding, model execution, KV state, logits, and sampling.
  • Governed lane: decisions about tools, memory, claims, structural changes, and public artifacts.

Governance wraps the runtime; it does not silently rewrite parity behavior.

Decision surfaces

  • Budget decisions: whether an action remains above the configured viability floor.
  • Claim boundaries: whether generated or published language exceeds current evidence.
  • Review gates: whether a structural or public change requires human approval.
  • Constraint decisions: whether runtime, tool, memory, or publication rules are violated.
  • No-op reasons: hard limit, excessive uncertainty, weak evidence, missing review, or constraint violation.

Receipts, evidence, and quarantine

Governed actions can produce immutable decision receipts that identify the request, model, budget result, claim-boundary result, review status, evidence references, quarantine state, and UTC decision time. Uncertain artifacts remain quarantined until an explicit promotion workflow succeeds.

Roadmap boundary

The experimental roadmap applies these principles to host-controlled budgets, backend evidence, checkpoint recovery, no-op, fail-closed behavior, and termination. It remains proposal-only: model output cannot authorize actions, package source is unchanged, and operator control remains authoritative.

Cognitive liberty boundary

The runtime may classify model files, configuration, tool permissions, generated artifacts, evidence, and request state. It must not present itself as an authority over human belief, private inquiry, or the legitimacy of a conversation.

Apply the review model

Turn a suggestion into bounded review evidence.

Use the static packet to record scope, evidence, cost, uncertainty, structural operator, human-review triggers, and a safe no-op fallback.